Message posted by Adrian at 02:14 am, Thu 25th Dec 2008
I have been a Labour party supporter all my life and I am a member I cannot believe some of the language used in relation to people who receive entiltlements.My wife became disabled 5 years ago and
had experience of being "helped" into work she was urged to take a minimum wage to shuffle papers about for people with the combined IQ of a potato who were the people entrusted by contract to so
help people- as she was shortly before been a manager she declined this offer - it what way was that helping her? not only faced with a disability- to be totally insulted by such an offer- at the
same time I was working and became her carer and applied for Carers allowance in doing so I had to take time off work to go to the job centre to discuss getting a job Is it me or is the world going
mad? Conditionality works both ways we have provided 50 years of NI and taxes this is what we have paid it for- the Government is being totally irresponsible- they are the benefit thiefs- they are
the rats we and millions have others have paid into the state coffers for times of sickness instead of attacking us Labour should be looking after us or it is no Party at all
Options: Reply to this message | Report this message as offensive
Message posted by Rodrigo at 10:40 am, Sun 7th Dec 2008
James Purnell has just appeared on Andrew Marr's, expounding his views on welfare, and I have to say these are already upstaged by an economic landscape that makes it Lasr Year's ambition to be Fully
Employed, to drive home that the Priority of the Ill and incapable is - not with Health (!), but to be back in Employment - presumably employment they have just left through inability to support both
ill-health and Employment! JP likes a Competitive and flexible work-force, and the Employers have consistently proved they do not want ill people in their work-force. Absenteeism is not built into
the Employer's plans for his employees. Employers vote with their feet on this. The disabled simply are not employed by anyone. Nor should they be. They should be provided for under support that
supports them in their Incapacity to work. It flies in the face of good sense to be advocating Work, for people who have no capacity to Work, just as it is impossible for retired people to join
apprenticeships! As for Responsibilities, the Responsibility for such people is towards their health and material well-being and survival, not to prop up an out-dated notion of Full Employment in the
face of a recession which is biting deep into the British economy. So looking at this Welfare Reform, I conclude that the lower rungs of a precarious ladder are being knocked out! No Incapacity
Benefit! And No Income support! Abolition of Poverty just became Abolition of the protection of the poor and needy... Clearly this needs to be rethought through, so James Purnell does not make a
bigger fool of himself than is strictly necessary. When you are disabled you come to recognise that the spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak, and it is simply incredibly Cruel to be rubbing our
noses into the Fact that we do not need impressing upon us, that we don't work, but Should work when we know that it is out of our hands - WE CANNOT, because we are not Able, to Work!
Options: Reply to this message | Report this message as offensive
Message posted by Julie at 10:29 pm, Thu 18th Sep 2008
Lets get education into smaller education facilities with more flexible grouping / approach. Teachers going to the students/pupils for blocked learning rather than students going through traffic
congestion to large alientating buildings. Mixed age classes & assessments tailored to each individual is possible with the technology we have available. All members of the community can be
integrated to help others learn & be familiar with each other which could help build mutual respect. Each local community could have, for example, a Herb garden staffed by appropriately trained
professional to advise on Herbal Medicine use, such as comfrey being used for some typical sports injuries.
Options: Reply to this message | Report this message as offensive


Labour have announced radical plans to reform the welfare system based on a simple deal: more support in return for greater responsibility.