National strategy to ensure more children get better GCSEs
- £400 million funding available to support schools to improve at English and mathsEd Balls MP, Labour’s Children’s Secretary, today set out the next phase in the Government’s School Improvement Strategy – National Challenge.
National Challenge will transform schools, raise results in English and maths, and tackle underachievement by young people.
The Labour Government’s Children’s Plan sets out that by 2020 at least 90 per cent of children will achieve the equivalent of five higher level GCSEs by the age of 19.
National Challenge is important step on the way towards this – to meet the goal that in every secondary school, at least 30 per cent of its pupils will achieve five good GCSEs including English and maths by 2011.
In 1997 there were 1,610 schools below this 30 per cent minimum standard; today there are 638 - the National Challenge sets out how we will reduce this number to zero.
Ed Balls announced that he would double the £200m previously announced in the budget to £400m to help local authorities and schools.
The extra funding could mean that up to 70 National Challenge schools could be converted into Academies over and above existing plans, and that up to 120 new Trust schools could be created. This 120 could include 70 National Challenge Trusts where a school links with another high performing school as well as an external partner such as a university or business.
To kick-start the National Challenge, Ed Balls asked local authorities to set out by the end of the school summer term, individual action plans for how they will transform results in each National Challenge school from now until 2011.
Ed Balls said: “Schools have made huge progress. In 1997, there were 1,610 schools where fewer than 30 per cent of pupils gained five good GCSEs including English and maths; today there are 638.
“Our goal over the next three years is to get every school to this minimum 30% standard and to get that 638 down to zero. Every parent needs to know that their local school will get to this basic standard.
“Most areas still have at least one National Challenge school.
“GCSE success is not the only measure of how a school performs, but it is critical – teenagers need these qualifications to go on to further study, work and prosperity. A young person with five good GCSEs will almost always earn considerably more than a teenager who leaves school with no qualifications. Employers expect these qualifications as a minimum.
“I know that teachers in National Challenge schools are working hard often in difficult circumstances. They need more support so that these schools and their children can reach their full potential. We need rapid but sustainable improvement to raise children’s aspirations and their job prospects.
“Of course National Challenge schools face real challenges but no child and no school is on a pre-determined path to low results. There are many schools in communities of high unemployment and low aspirations where children achieve excellent GCSE results. For each National Challenge school, another school facing similar problems has already turned itself around.
“I don’t want to see excuses about poor performance - I want to see clear plans to raise standards.”
The key aspects of the National Challenge are:
• £400m available to support National Challenge schools over the next three years - £200m announced in the Budget - plus a further £200m allocated from existing resources and re-prioritised towards National Challenge schools;
• More one-to-one tuition and study support in English and maths for children in National Challenge schools; plus extra support from National Strategies’ experts for weak English and maths departments;
• Additional support for senior leaders in schools to support maths and science departments;
• Highly respected education expert Sir Mike Tomlinson will chair a new National Challenge Panel of Expert Advisers to support low attaining schools. The panel will consist of heads who have successfully turned around underperforming schools, City Challenge Advisers and Directors of Children’s Services;
• Each National Challenge school will be allocated a National Challenge Adviser, who will work with the school leadership to develop a tailored package of support;
• By 2011 150 more National Leaders of Education – outstanding ‘super-heads’ with past experience of turning schools around – will work alongside Heads to help solve problems at the schools;
• The new Masters in Teaching and Learning will be made available in National Challenge Schools;
• As well as Academies, where a school is completely unable to raise their exam results, the Government will encourage local authorities to close the school and replace it with a National Challenge Trust, providing that they forge new improvement partnerships led by a successful school and a business or university partner. The aim would be to give the school and the community a fresh beginning and a break with previous underachievement;
• Encouragement to use tried and tested school improvement models, such as partnerships with successful schools (federations) or partnerships with business or universities (Trusts), so that National Challenge schools benefit from new governance arrangements and best practice;
• The Government will legislate to take new powers to direct local authorities to issue a warning notice where there is clear cause for concern – such as exam results getting worse; to appoint Interim Executive Boards where the school is under a warning notice; and to require a local authority to take on advisory services where there are large numbers of schools with unacceptably low standards.
Gary Message left at 10:57 pm, Thu 28th Aug 2008
Lets get real ,exams are a way of measuring students ,the new ways Government encourage schools to deliver results means turning away from Teaching and Understanding but developing a school system
where teachers rather than teaching subjects instead teach how to pass exams using whatever methods necessary to gain the results not for the pupils but for themselves ,not only that a qualification
cheaply and widely earned is a qualification whose value is steadily diminished ,are we producing accomplished students or co-operative exam passers?
Options: reply to this message | report this message as offensive
Michael Message left at 09:17 pm, Tue 10th Jun 2008
This is excellent news – Labour investing in young people who will earn wealth of our country and build communities in future decades. I am pleased to see Labour put forward facts on the success by
saying in 1997 there were 1,610 schools below the 30 per cent minimum standard; today there are 638 – and even with this improvement they are going forward to make better ground with the National
Challenge to reduce this number to zero. The future will be a skill interactive technology based community if we take the inventions of the mobile phone and internet as our indicator. It would seem
sensible to link into schools at an early stage providers of vocational training and qualifications (such as City and Guilds). Is this something worth considering for the National Challenge where
available new choices in learning at school can include inspiring and empowering subjects, like Active Citizenship and Health Trainer qualifications that are becoming important in all communities
across the UK. In my City I see the new Academy work well, it inspires hope and vision which is in turn now motivating young people to learn more and become better prepared to be self thinkers. This
is quality investment, making the learning environment and facilities attractive. The learner becomes part of the improvement and their better mental state encourages success Labour also needs to let
young people know they are valued citizens, welcomed to be active in volunteering or in creating new social enterprises or being supported with self-confidence and team builder skills where their
home life needs them to care for their relative. People First is not such a bad idea and if Labour achieves the National Challenge, society will be the winner.
Options: reply to this message | report this message as offensive
Carl Message left at 04:45 pm, Mon 16th Jun 2008
If you look closely at these so called failing schools you will see that the majority lie in areas of great social deprivation. Many of thise schools have positive CVA scores, indeed some are in the
top 10 nationally for CVA. many have good or even outstanding OFSTED reports. So wht has no-one made the link between the social deprivation of the catchment area of the school instead of blaming the
school itself! Only when these problems are solved will you see a change in the education of the children of the areas.
Options: reply to this message | report this message as offensive