John Denham speaks to Conference
- Check against delivery -
There's something each of us have in common.
We came into Labour to change the world.
And we wanted to change the world, so that we could change people's lives.
And that's what we are doing.
Just think;
Of one and a half million adults, parents, grandparents who today cannot read their children a story.
And think, in three years time: one and a half million adults, parents and grandparents starting to help with the homework.
That's Labour. Changing lives.
Think today of over half a million people who have left school, never been to university, never had the chance, didn't think it was for them. Perhaps some of you in this conference hall.
In three years time, embarked on their first university course.
That's Labour. Changing lives.
And you know, as we improve adult skills at every level, we won't just change adult lives.
When a parent sees new opportunities opening up, and discovers new ambitions - we know their children will have better opportunities; their children will have higher ambitions.
Once, we chose to make education our route to opportunity.
Today, we have no choice.
A global economy. Climate change. Extraordinary new technologies. People, money and knowledge ever more mobile.
Huge emerging nations with justifiably great ambitions.
These are powerful forces; enough to make anyone feel insecure. And they can have the harshest impact on those least equipped to respond.
But what I know is that together we can respond. Today's changes can be tomorrow's opportunities.
But only if we make the most of the talent and ability of every individual.
Only if we carry out world class science, research and scholarship.
Only if we turn fundamental research into world beating products and services. Not just things to sell, but bringing the world solutions to sustainable energy, cures for diseases, answers to an ageing society.
That's how change becomes an opportunity.
That's Labour's way.
Not the Tory way.
When David Cameron welcomed the Redwood report, he welcomed that said we should not plan for more young people to go to university.
David Cameron is wrong for our young people. Wrong for Britain.
He welcomed a report that would limit university to people with specific 'A' levels, slamming the door on people who left school early.
David Cameron is wrong for Britain.
And he's wrong for business too.
70% of the workforce of 2020 has already left school. The Tories just don't understand that every second one of us must up our skill level for Britain to succeed.
So it's Labour that is transforming the training system:
To meet the needs of the companies who will create the jobs of the future.
To meet the needs of the employees of the future.
For businesses we will make sure that our colleges and trainers offer the skills companies need at the place and time that is right for them.
For each individual, we will bring new rights to learn and train.
Two thirds of young English students will get grants at university.
We'll guarantee support for students from low income homes. We'll make loan repayments more flexible.
I've just introduced new Adult Learning Grants for 30,000 college students a year.
Over the next three years - Skills Accounts, the start of millions of people with the power to shape the training they will need.
A legal right to train for your first real qualification.
A young person's right to train for higher skills. And the right to an apprenticeship with real status.
A personal advancement service to guide and help you through qualifications, courses, employment rights and childcare.
A right to train sounds dull. Think of it as the right to support that can change your life.
What's most likely to get you to study again? Your best friend saying 'you can do it!' So I'm proud our Labour movement has produced 18,000 volunteer Union Learning Reps. Best friends in 6,000 workplaces up and down the country; who encouraged over 250,000 people back to train last year. Thank you.
In the same way it's employer who have the most influence on other employers. Over 250 companies covering two and a half million employees have now made the Skills Pledge. With the CBI all the ministers in my department are touring the country urging more employers to sign up.
As our drive for world class skills takes hold, attitudes will change.
So when someone complains they are in a dead end job, their best friend will say 'get retrained'.
When an employer complains about the shortage of skills, others should ask 'what are you doing to train your staff?'
And we will work with our great universities and colleges to make the changes Britain needs.
Never have our universities been more important to our success. To keep at the forefront of global science and research. To turn more of their brilliant research into world beating products, services and jobs.
That's why over a billion pounds of public and private money will be invested through the Technology Strategy Board and the Energy Technologies Institute - the places that will identify and develop the technology of the future.
That's why we've invested more in higher education than ever before.
To meet the needs of business - from the growing company down the road to the international corporation.
To help make Britain the best place in the world for innovation.
And, yes, to make sure that no university is closed to the talent of our young people wherever they went to school.
So, Conference, whether you ask, 'How does Britain succeed in a changing world?'
Or you ask:
'How does each of us find security and prosperity in the years ahead?'
The answer is going to be the same.
Together.
Together, we need the skills and talent of all our people;
We'll put them together with the best research and the best science in the world to create the best place in the world to build and run an innovative business.
Together that's what we are going to do.
That's Labour.
No one left to struggle in a changing world.
No opportunity missed.
No talent left unlocked.
Linda Message left at 09:11 am, Thu 4th Oct 2007
I don't know what happened to my last comment, but it was in agreement with the posters here who are against the cuts in higher education and I linked to a facebook group herewhere you can join to protest at these cuts. Please join.
Options: reply to this message | report this message as offensive
Nikki Message left at 12:23 pm, Mon 1st Oct 2007
I could quote numerous sections of the above speech from Mr Denham that make me extremely concerned but I will simply refer to the last paragraph: "That's Labour. No one left to struggle in a
changing world. No opportunity missed. No talent left unlocked." I'm one of those individuals that Labour is supposedly supporting: I'm a single mother of three, from a "deprived background", the
first to study at higher education level in my family, and looking to re-enter the workforce. I have been 'lucky' to have received government funding for my degree which I completed with first class
honours this year. But now I'm being told "that's it, no more help for you" simply because I have achieved a degree. Is that the end to my opportunity, the end of my talent? Labour wanted to change
lives, well with Mr Denham's proposed cuts to higher education for equivalent and lower level qualifications it will, but not for the better. I have a first class honours degree thus I am
unemployable in 'lower' jobs, but I do not have the diversity of education that would gain me financially viable employment. For this I would need equivalent or lower level higher education
qualifications... but Mr Denham is removing funding for these. So how does that help me? How does that help the thousands of other graduates who find themselves in a similar 'unemployable' situation?
Quite simply it doesn't. It leaves many graduates in receipt of state benefits when they have the talent to make an enormous difference to the economy, if only they were given the opportunity to gain
that elusive piece of paper that their potential employers require to even consider them for a position. No opportunity missed? No talent left unlocked? No one left to struggle in a changing world?
Yes, that's Labour... locking the doors on all students who have gained a higher education qualification and making it potentially impossible for them to continue to study for qualifications that
could change their lives. What is their rationale behind this? To attempt to encourage "younger" students to take their first higher education qualification. Well I don't class myself as old yet, I'm
still in my twenties and still have a lengthy period of employability that would see me paying vast amounts of taxes... but apparently I'm already not worth bothering about. Many thanks Mr Denham,
I'm so glad I voted Labour now! At least I can rest easy knowing that my children will be able to study for one higher education qualification. Of course, once they've got that they'll be on the
scrap heap too, unless of course this government sees sense and realises the grave mistake it is making in reducing funding for those who have already proved that they have talent worth nurturing!
Options: reply to this message | report this message as offensive
Cheryl Message left at 06:15 pm, Fri 28th Sep 2007
Will the real John Denham please stand up? There are clearly two of them. One that cuts HEFCHE funding for anyone who already has a degree and prevents higher education institutions receiving funding
for courses undertaken by such students if those courses are at a lower level. And the one who supports an enquiry into why so many adult learners have "disappeared" from the system, saying that "I
think there's a very good debate to be had about how we continue to ensure that we get as many people as possible with the ability to enjoy that sort of learning - learning very often for its own
sake but which brings a lot of personal and social benefits," - at least according to the Guardian web site (http://education.guardian.co.uk/egweekly/story/0,,2175923,00.html).
Options: reply to this message | report this message as offensive
Jon Message left at 03:16 pm, Thu 27th Sep 2007
When John says: "We need the skills and talent of all our people" "No one left to struggle in a changing world" "No talent left unlocked" I couldn't agree more. When Gordon says "I stand for a
Britain where every young person who has it in them to study at college or university should not be prevented by money from doing so." I agree with that too. But why only young people? We should be
maximizing everyone’s potential, young, middle-aged and old, which is why I read John’s letter to HEFCE a few weeks ago with some sadness. Equivalent-level education is not the same thing as
equivalent education. I agree with Donald’s comments, it is robbing Peter to pay Paul. How can it be a good thing for people to get an education up to their early twenties and expect it to last them
the rest of their lives? The world is changing too fast for that. We can certainly afford to let the people of this country have a second chance in education. It will pay for itself. I’m not sure
whether we can afford not to.
Options: reply to this message | report this message as offensive
Alan Message left at 06:47 pm, Wed 26th Sep 2007
I am 61 years of age and retired and have 4 very valued grand childern whom both my wife and myself are extremely proud of. Their ages range from 11 to 4. Two are in private education and two are in
state education but all are talented in their own way. We are worried that the two in state education will not through no fault of their parents, be aloowed to fulfil their true potential. What can
labour do to help them? Worried grandparents.
Options: reply to this message | report this message as offensive
Peter Thomas Message left at 09:29 pm, Wed 26th Sep 2007
If Johns ideas are materialised then your two grand children will be able to develop their talents to their advantage and be of good service to employers and the nation as a whole.Iam 68,Iwas at a
secondary modern (state)school having failed my eleven plus exams.Ileft school at fifteen and started an apprenticeship in my local railway works .That was expected of me because my father was
working in the woks so was my grandfather ,but my schoolteachers thought that I should have stayed on for school certificate (CSE).Idid go to night school and further education at technical college
.imanaged to get ONC in mechanical engineering,but it was a struggle with not enough moneyto by books and stationary with.After I came out of national service there was no future in engineering after
thirteen years of tory government .If you got a better job it wasnt what you knew it was who you knew so I say support Labour and help us win a fourth term.
Options: reply to this message | report this message as offensive
Donald Message left at 01:10 pm, Wed 26th Sep 2007
I think with respect that there is a lack of joined up thinking in the government's plans. One can appreciate that the government wishes to have life long learning and one can appreciate that lots of
youngsters need to be educated to degree level BUT shifting funds from one to the other in the way that the Secretary of State proposes to do does not make sense. I would respectfully remind the
Secretary of State that they way that (for example) the Open University distributes the funds made available to it by HEFCE means that any cuts in its funding will mean that it is not able to
perpetuate the lifelong learning agenda because such cuts will diminish the number of students able to study with it. This is an important factor which I think the Secretary of State should reflect
upon. So the re-direction of funds to younger students through HEFCE will not result in the desired effect in the Open University's case. I would therefore ask the Secretary of State to re-consider
his position and avoid damaging what is a world class University. Thanks, Donald.
Options: reply to this message | report this message as offensive